So if you’re keen to go down the multitrack approach, what are your options? Let’s start with the digital side of things. Here, multitrack recorders still give you flexibility correcting volume levels and varying mic technique, but there will always be a level of ‘bleed’. If our phone ringing example happened in a ‘local’ recording session of 2 (or more) participants in the same room, the noise would still be picked up by everyone’s individual mic. Multitrack recording isn’t infallible either. Increased editing/production time – it may take you longer to merge together and process the individual tracks.Increased complexity – it may make recording sessions trickier to set up and manage.Increased costs – you may need additional equipment, “better” equipment, or new software. ![]() But ,there are still a few things to consider. The above example alone is enough to convince anyone that multitrack recording is the better option. ![]() Potential Cons of Recording Audio on Separate Tracks With a multitrack recorder, you’d just remove or silence that section of your track in the editing process, and the listeners will never know it has happened. If you were recording the interview on one single track, the noise of the ringtone would be mixed in with the interview guest’s answer. As they’re giving you a detailed and thorough answer to a question, suddenly, your phone rings. Here’s a classic example of multitrack recording at work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |